cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
Blog Article
“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any on the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after far they noticed the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't indicate that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These evidence cannot be treated as evidence of very last noticed.
The court emphasized that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity with the offense demands the most stringent punishment, looking at the sanctity of human life and deterrence for likely offenders.
Life imprisonment can be an alternative towards the death penalty. In these cases, the convicted person is sentenced to invest the remainder of their natural life powering bars.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Given the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are of your view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally sound, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be subject to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case in the petitioners for promotion may very well be regarded, however, we have been clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, topic to availability of vacancy matter for the approval of the competent authority.
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—would be the principle by which judges are bound to these past decisions, drawing on proven judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, Additionally it is a perfectly-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August 28th, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government agencies in regards to projects that could possibly pose a public risk. This case can be noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all foreseeable future public interest litigation brought before courts for environmental protection.” To cite only one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found during the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is often a right to life itself.
Extra username and password are required for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
Accessing free case law sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and any one seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Supplied the legal analysis on the topic issue, we're of your view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally seem, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be subject to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case on the petitioners for promotion could possibly be thought of, however, we are very clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority website and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, topic to availability of vacancy topic for the approval on the competent authority.
Using keywords effectively is usually critical. Take into account using synonyms and variations of your keywords to make sure you seize all relevant results. Understanding the citation system used by Pakistani courts will also help you pinpoint specific cases.
one. Judicial Independence: The court emphasized the importance of judicial independence as well as the separation of powers.
147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and fork out fixation are certainly not entertainable with the reasons that these kinds of matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, as well as the legal grounds for this petition are inadequate therefore this petition is dismissed, which entails disputed claims and counterclaims on the topic post, therefore this court is not in the position to dilate upon this sort of disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.